Website Search

 

Streaming Video

Video Playlists

Includes Feature Films, Kistler Prize Acceptance Speeches, Interviews, Lectures, and Scholar Visions of the Long-term Future

 

Recent Publications

“Global Transitions and Asia 2060” Executive Summary

“Water – The Crisis Ahead” Executive Summary

Winter 2010 Newsletter

All Foundation publications are available for download from our Publications page.

 

RECENT Events

“Global Population and the Planetary Future – 2011”

• Humanity 3000 Workshop
• October 2011

Walter P. Kistler Book Award

• Dr. Laurence C. Smith
• October 2011

12th Annual Kistler Prize

• Dr. Charles A. Murray
• September 2011

Norman Myers Lecture

• Walter P. Kistler Lecture Series
• May 2011

“Global Transitions and Asia 2060” Workshop

• Taipei, Taiwan
• November 2010

Peter Ward Lecture

• Walter P. Kistler Lecture Series
• October 2010

“Managing the Future”

• Talk by Sesh Velamoor
• July 2010

 

 

 

 

Programs

Humanity 3000

 

HOME | SEMINARS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | SYMPOSIA 1 2 | WORKSHOPS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

 

Workshop 5

“Anthropogenic Climate Destabilization: A Worst-case Scenario”
Participant Statement

September 12–14, 2008 | Bellevue, Washington

< Previous | Main | Next >

Andrey Ganopolski

What are the three critical questions you would ask pertaining to “anthropogenic climate change: a worst-case scenario” – and why?

1. How realistic are current climate models in simulation of non-linear aspects of climate response to global warming?

The current generation of climate models represents a product of relatively long history of numerical climate modeling. They are extensively tuned to empirical climatology and, to some extent, validated against instrumental data for the past century. However, this is primarily related to quasi-linear aspects of climate response to changes in the concentration of greenhouse gases. If the climate system is indeed a strongly non-linear one, as indicated by paleoclimate data, then the ability of climate models to predict such strongly non-linear behavior remains essentially unknown due to difficulties in models validation and large inter-model differences.

2. What is the shortest timescale of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets of the response to global warming?

Simulations performed with the ice sheet models indicate that the response time of Greenland, and, especially, Antarctic ice sheet to global warming is rather long, and even for the extreme climate change scenarios it takes several millennia for a complete melting of the ice sheets. This would imply a rather moderate contribution of the ice sheets to global sea-level rise. However, the current generation of ice sheet models does not properly describe a number of important glaciological processes (such as ice streams) that may be important for the response time of the ice sheets.

3. What can we learn from the abrupt climate changes in the past about potential tipping points in the climate system?

There is a growing body of paleoclimate records that indicates that at least several components of climate system (Atlantic thermohaline circulation, ice sheets, shelf ice, etc.) were involved in numerous abrupt climate changes during the glacial age. It is still not possible to realistically simulate any of these abrupt climate changes with the climate models used for future climate change prediction. The important question is whether this fact casts doubts on the reliability of the future climate predictions taking into account that climate instability of the glacial age cannot be considered as a direct analogy for future climate change.